Gay Indian Couple Gets Married Traditionally In A Hindu Temple In New Jersey, Since Same-Sex Marriages Remain Illegal In India

Love knows no boundaries. That’s what Amit Shah and Aditya Madiraju proved when they got married during a traditional, religious Hindu ceremony, in a temple in New Jersey.

The Indian couple’s impressive and stylish wedding was immortalized by professional photographer Charmi Peña. Her pictures from the event were such a success, they immediately went viral. Which is why the entire internet is busy talking about Amit and Aditya’s union.

More info: Instagram | Charmi Peña

Image credits: Charmi Pena Photography

Dance choreographer Amit, who is 32, and his husband Aditya, who is 31 and works in risk management, are both practicing Hindus. Tradition is very important to them. That’s why after dating for a few years, they filled out the paperwork for a civil union in New York City at the start of 2019, and then also decided to have a traditional ceremony in New Jersey on July 19. The pair wore striking kurtas by designer Anita Dongre during the actual wedding ceremony.

Image credits: Charmi Pena Photography

“We didn’t realize the impact a simple wedding at a temple would have on people around the world looking for hope,” Amit and Aditya wrote on Instagram. Aditya told Irish News that “Having a traditional wedding is something that wasn’t out of the ordinary for either of us as we come from pretty traditional and conservative backgrounds.”

Image credits: Charmi Pena Photography

Meanwhile, Amit explained to Vogue India that the couple first met “three years ago in a small Lower East Side bar for a friend’s birthday. Since that night, we have been together.”

“Although we have completely different personalities, thanks to our similar interests we hit it off instantly,” Amit told the media. He also revealed that the pair ‘came out’ to their parents after dating for a year, and were rewarded with lots of support.

Image credits: Charmi Pena Photography

In India, same-sex marriage hasn’t been recognized legally yet, with opinions on the issue varying from disapproving to favorable, depending on the area, community and temple in question.